PLEASE TELL US A LITTLE ABOUT YOURSELF SO THAT WE CAN DISPLAY THE MOST
APPROPRIATE CONTENT TO YOU:

This site uses cookies. Some of the cookies are essential for parts of the site to operate and have already been set. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but if you do, parts of the site may not work. To find out more about cookies used on Trustnet and how you can manage them, see our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

By clicking "I Agree" below, you acknowledge that you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

For more information Click here

Login

Password Reminder
Not Registered? Click Here

Register

Register
It's look like you're leaving us

What would you like us to do with the funds you've selected

Show me all my options Forget them Save them
Customise this table
You are here: Manager factsheet

Mark Nash
Jupiter Unit Trust Mgrs Ltd, Jupiter Asset Management, Three Rock Capital Management
pdfIcon Manager factsheet pdf    rss feed RSS Feed
Manager profile
Mark was head of fixed income and a portfolio manager at Merian Global Investors. Prior to this, he worked at Invesco Asset Management, where he was head of global multi-sector portfolio management and head of European fixed income strategy. He began his investment career in 2001.Mark has a BSc in Chemistry and is a CFA® charterholder.
Total return for Mark Nash
Manager career performance
Rolling Alpha Quartile: Discrete three year periods
Rolling Alpha Quartile shows a manager's alpha score in quartile terms, plotting his or her risk adjusted performance against all other managers in the UT & OEICs universe. The best managers are those who are consistently ranked in the first or second quartile.
 
Quartile 1
Quartile 2
Quartile 3
Quartile 4
 
 
 
 
 
60-96m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
72-108m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
84-120m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
96-132m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
108-144m
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Discrete calendar year performance : Mark Nash

Manager career performance
Discrete performance
  0-12m 12-24m 24-36m 36-48m 48-60m 60-72m 72-84m 84-96m 96-108m 108-120m
Mark Nash 0.4 -3.7 13.5 -1.7 8.2 9.5 -2.2 -2.9 8.9 1.8
Peer Group Composite 5.3 -0.3 -1.9 -1.4 4.5 4.6 -0.3 -1.6 13.1 -2.6
Over / Under -4.9 -3.4 15.4 -0.3 3.7 4.9 -1.9 -1.3 -4.2 4.4
Performance vs peer group composite: Mark Nash
How a manager matches up against their peers gives you some idea of how talented they are. Very few managers perform equally well in rising and falling markets, so knowing which type of market a manager is capable of performing well within is also important.
 
Overall markets
Up
Outperformed peer group composite
4 years
out of a possible 10
 
Overall markets
Up
Underperformed peer group composite
6 years
out of a possible 10
 
Rising markets
UpDown
Outperformed peer group composite
2 years
out of a possible 4
 
Falling markets
UpDown
Outperformed peer group composite
2 years
out of a possible 6
Funds currently managed
Fund Sole/Co-managed Sector Periods
Jupiter Global Macro Bond Co-managed UT Global Bonds since Aug 01 2016 to present
Jupiter Strategic Absolute Return Bond Co-managed FO Absolute Return since Aug 01 2016 to present
Jupiter Strategic Absolute Return Bond Lead manager FO Absolute Return since Nov 14 2023 to present
Funds managed previously
Fund Periods
Invesco Sustainable Multi-Sector Credit since Apr 01 2007 to Sep 17 2014
Invesco Bond since Jun 01 2010 to Mar 23 2016
Jupiter Global Fixed Income since Apr 25 2019 to Jun 06 2023
Merian Global Strategic Bond (IRL) since Aug 01 2016 to Apr 25 2019
Invesco Euro Bond since Sep 04 2013 to Mar 23 2016
Invesco Absolute Return Bond II since Apr 01 2007 to fund close
Invesco Gilt since Apr 01 2015 to Mar 23 2016
Invesco Real Return (EUR) Bond since Apr 01 2015 to Mar 23 2016
News & Research: Related articles sector Sector fund Fund group Group manager Manager
Group The equity funds on track to beat the market for the sixth year in a row By Gary Jackson  21-Nov-2024
Group Pridham Report: Equity income gains popularity but appetite for passives wanes By Patrick Sanders  20-Nov-2024
Group Jupiter hires GAM European equity team led by Niall Gallagher By Patrick Sanders  19-Nov-2024
Group Should you buy, hold or fold Jupiter India – and India in general? By Matteo Anelli  19-Nov-2024
Group Mixed asset, equity income and Trump trades: The funds that investors have been eyeing in 2024’s second half By Gary Jackson  15-Nov-2024
Group M&G sustainability range loses Square Mile ratings on fund merger plans By Gary Jackson  05-Nov-2024
Group The best and worst funds in October By Gary Jackson  01-Nov-2024
Group Five quality-growth stocks, allocating to silver and for how much longer will the UK remain a buyer’s market? Thoughts from Fundswire this week By Diana Llewellyn  25-Oct-2024
Group Is the era of the ‘star’ manager over? By Patrick Sanders  21-Oct-2024
Group M&G Recovery: Should you buy, hold or fold? By Patrick Sanders  14-Oct-2024
Group Two-fund portfolios: The multi-asset approach By Matteo Anelli  11-Oct-2024
Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.

LATEST :

Five reasons to keep hold of your defensive funds

13:00 | Monday, January 20, 2014

Close

You are currently using an old browser which will not be supported by Trustnet after 31/07/2016. To ensure you benefit from all features on the site, please update your browser.   Close

© Trustnet Limited 2024. All Rights Reserved.
Please read our Terms of Use / Disclaimer and Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Data supplied in conjunction with Refinitiv and London Stock Exchange Plc